ROMNEY WORDSWORTH- A judge in Colorado has ordered a child removed from her mother’s care because the mother believes in “chemtrails”.The judge called it a “fringe subculture” that represented a threat to her daughter.
Boulder Judge Dolores Mallard told resident Becca Vandb that her belief in the chemtrail conspiracy – that aerosol trails emitted by commercial and military aircraft are in fact part of clandestine geoengineering program – was a radical view because “99% of people would know those are just contrails.”
Vandb said that the inquiry was triggered after she raised the subject of chemtrails during a visit to her daughter’s school and was immediately told to leave the premises.
“I can now only see my daughter with a social security worker standing over me taking notes, and the judge said this was so that if I mention chemtrails they would put a stop to that. I am being railroaded for expressing my views about chemtrails,” wrote Vandb, adding that she had not received any CPS visits nor were there any allegations of child abuse made by the court or her daughter’s school.
According to Judge Mallard, Vandb being “immersed in a fringe subculture” means “she is a danger to her daughter.”Her daughter is already a pre-teen.The Judge’s contention that her mother’s political beliefs are somehow a “danger” to her daughter is nothing short of an assault on the Bill of Rights, and our freedom.
Whether you believe in the reality of chemtrails or not, this is a chilling act of Tyranny.This represents the State punishing an individual by taking away their child, solely because of their political beliefs.Will the government next start taking away the children of those who don’t believe in Global Warming?
The government officially denies it is spraying the country with chemtrails, but there is actually solid evidence to the contrary.
Go read the Space & Preservation Act of 2001. In this document the United States Government openly admits the existence of Chemtrails and weather control weapons.An article from USA Today from Feb 25th, 2011 titled “Can Geoengineering put the freeze on global warming?” admits that Chemtrails and Geoengineering exist, but it’s done to protect us from Global Warming.
There are patents for these very things. On record with the U.S. Patent Office from December 5th, 2010: Spraying the Skies: 1975 U.S. Patent for Powder Contrail Generation. Some of these patents date back all the way to March 1st, 1927.
There is an ongoing lawsuit in Canada to expose and halt the chemical spraying.It has been brought by the non profit Stop Geoengineering Legal Defense Fund.
Once these chemicals are sprayed, several hours later they descend several hours later to the ground where people are exposed to these toxins.The toxins seep into the soil and water and eventually into plant life as well.This eventually affects the food chain.
So, what is “The Law”?Did the Judge follow “The Law” in this case?Of course not!The Law in America states that absent actual physical or emotional abuse of a child, the State has no right to take a child from a parent.The First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech and religion, which covers political beliefs and even belief in conspiracies.But in this case, the Judge and the whole Government System took a child away from a mother based solely on her political beliefs.The idea that those political beliefs caused some sort of “harm” (unspecified and unquantified, naturally) to the child was a legal conclusion reached by the Judge without any proofs.And if we are about to say that a parent’s political beliefs can cause “harm” to a child, they where does that road end?It ends in Fascism and the end of the First Amendment, of course.
I’m a lawyer, and I’ve quit the practice of law. There’s no point in being a lawyer anymore when we are no longer a Nation of Laws. The “Law”, such as it is, is whatever powerful bureaucrats and Judges declare it is, as this case illustrates. Notice how the State will ignore and fail to follow the law when it gets in the way of their agenda. Hiring a lawyer to point out that the law has not been followed will not get you anywhere anymore. The entire Judiciary has been corrupted, just as all our other institutions have been. A Judge is just a political appointee who got the job in the first place by being a good donor/fundraiser to the political party who appointed him/her or backed their election campaign. They are not neutral guardians of the law–they are political hacks and “fixers” who move the agenda of the Elites along. Look at how the Supreme Court operates nowadays. The fish rots from the head down. The politicization of Judges goes all the way down to the Municipal level.
We are no longer a Nation of Laws. The laws are malleable and like shifting sand. They mean whatever the Ruling Class want them to mean, and they ignore with aplomb any old laws that get in their way. The Constitution is supposed to be the Supreme Law of the Land. In practice, it is over-ruled and nullified routinely by Federal and State statute, local ordinance (1st and 2nd Amendment) and even College Codes of Conduct (1st, 2nd, 4th Amendment).
What to do if they come to take our children? I know many of the Keyboard Kommandoes you see in the comments section of various online forums will write:“shoot anyone who tries.” But we have to think beyond that moment of impassioned rage that we would all feel. The next people at your door would be a SWAT team that would likely shoot you in front of your children or imprison you and throw away the key. In either scenario the children get taken by the State and you lose.
If you can’t leave the U.S., your next best option is to home school your kids.It is the interaction with the public schools that most often leads to state interventions that lead to the State abducting children in order to punish the political beliefs of parents.This is exactly what happened to Becca Vandb.
HERE Is WHAT WILL HAPPEN If The DEEP STATE TAKES DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP & It’s NOT PRETTY … FOR THEM
“The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson
ELDER PATRIOT – Corrupt politicians ignore Jefferson’s directive to their own detriment. It’s no longer political, it’s personal.
Americans have had their eyes opened by the ascension of Donald Trump and no amount of leftwing money can put the Freedom Movement genie back in the bottle.
Conservative Senator Ted Cruz made that observation after reviewing the results of the 2016 elections and the expectations of the voters.
Cruz, who had the most high profile personality clash with Donald Trump during the Republican primary process nevertheless embraced Trump’s America First agenda and said, “If we’re given the White House and both houses of Congress and we don’t deliver, I think there will be pitchforks and torches in the streets. And I think quite rightly.”
Candidate Trump promised many things – border control, lower taxes, fairer trade relations, a balanced budget, healthcare that puts the people first not the government, safer communities, and – to the extent possible – an end to foreign wars. What, among those promises, should any Republican, nay any American, have a problem with?
After four months without a single legislative achievement, Congressional and Senatorial Republicans – notably John McCain, Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham – have joined the Democrats in investigating President Trump absent a single shred of evidence that an underlying crime has been committed.
So, what gives?
Well, there was one additional promise that Trump made on his way to the White House that has some Republicans joining with Democrats and quaking in their boots, Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp.”
As we reported yesterday, “An F.B.I. agent with ‘intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case’ told us that they uncovered evidence of such massive corruption that the agents involved realized that damned near the entire government could be brought down.”
The criminal co-conspirators in both parties realized almost immediately that the new sheriff wasn’t interested in joining them in the swamp so they launched, what can only be characterized as, a coup attempt.
Democrats are well schooled in such things probably because of their close alliance with Marxist regimes that can only gain power by seizing it through bloody civil wars. It should be noted that the Democratic Party has already done this once before.
One Hundred and Fifty-Seven years ago the Democrats waged a war against the First Republican President Abraham Lincoln for giving Blacks their freedom. That war came at a high price, as many as 700,000 Americans died fighting for what they believe in. To put that in perspective, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam.
Today, Americans are still prepared to fight and die to protect their children’s God-given freedoms. Despite what you are reading and hearing in the mainstream media, they aren’t the leftwing-funded rioters, the pussy hat-wearing feminists, or the cuck bois that cant handle a micro aggression. No, the Americans that back Donald Trump are well armed.
Donald Trump’s presidency will move forward politically lest the sixty million patriots who voted for him, that are comprised of the large majority of military voters, police, and NRA members, move it forward by force.
These patriots are armed, trained, prepared, and have proven their discipline. They have grown disgusted by the corruption in Washington and will do whatever is necessary to make sure Trump’s Freedom Agenda moves forward and under the direction of Donald Trump himself.
No amount of fake news based on unsubstantiated charges by unnamed sources is going to change that. The battle lines have been drawn and no amount of finger pointing is going to convince these patriots to let anyone overturn the election results.
So why are establishment politicians courting a bloodbath on the streets of America that will also threaten them personally when they could be part of Making America Great Again? It’s because they have been caught red-handed and up to their eyeballs in a worldwide criminal conspiracy that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with defrauding the American taxpayers.
And, now that they’ve been caught robbing the world’s largest bank – the U.S. treasury – they have chosen to go out in a blaze of glory rather than try to defend the indefensible at trial.
Washington’s criminal elites have chosen to go to war to unseat our duly elected president. It’s time to make our voices heard before this turns very ugly. Buckle your chin strap, America is counting on you.
EDITORS NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CALL TO ARMS BUT RATHER AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE DEEP STATES OVERTURNS A DUELY ELECTED PRESIDENT.
HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP
“Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance.
Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.”
Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump.
Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon.
“Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.”
Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday.
The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.”
But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why?
At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime.
“The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained:
For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code.
However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct.
A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.”
However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him.
. Obama’s Iran nuke deal
Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server
Obama IRS targets conservatives
Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters
Obamacare & Obama’s false promises
Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order
Operation Fast & Furious
5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl
‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session
Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval
Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law
Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act
Illegally conducting war against Libya
NSA: Spying on Americans
Muslim Brotherhood ties
Solyndra and the lost $535 million
Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress
Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers
Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’