ROMNEY WORDSWORTH – Although the explosive charges were set back in August of 2015, when the Colorado Republican Party decided to cancel this year’s presidential primary election, the party Oligarchs in Colorado pushed the plunger down on the detonator this past Saturday.Not only does this explode the democratic process and disenfranchise voters, it is also an act of Scorched Earth that will burn down the Republican Party as well.
The extent of the disenfranchisement went beyond rank and file voters.It even extended to party insiders who did get to vote on who would be selected as a delegate.One such insider called into the Rush Limbaugh program on Monday to tell the nation that the so-called Delegates all refused to tell anyone even within Saturday’s state convention who they planned to vote for.
Let me repeat that:The Oligarchs put up a slate of Delegates at the State Convention and made sure no one knew how they planned to vote.The Delegates refused to answer the question and they were selected while withholding this crucial information.I don’t know who these party insiders in Colorado are, but if it had been me in that situation, I would have been overturning tables and breaking noses with the righteousness of Jesus Christ against the temple money changers.
Why bother with voting for delegates?In their quest to hold on to power and ignore the will of the voters, that is precisely where the Oligarchs now sit:They don’t see any point to holding elections or having a democratic process anymore, and are prepared to dispense with the charade altogether.
I don’t have a Twitter account, because the people who run Twitter censor conservative thought.But if I did, I would be circulating a hashtag that says I will never let myself be used as window dressing by the Oligarchy for a fraudulent election process.It was on this precise point, no taxation without representation, at which the Founding Fathers started breaking out the shot & powder.We have now come full circle back to an even worse tyranny, in less than 300 years.They can hijack the election process, but we don’t have to participate.In fact, at a certain point, we have a moral obligation to withhold our participation and not give any credibility to such corruption.
Many are blaming Ted Cruz, and are attributing Colorado’s outcome to his organization and “ground game”.I do not.The state party apparatus sent out a telling tweet immediately after the fix was in:“#NeverTrump:We did it!”Yes, indeed you did.You subverted the electoral process and disenfranchised Republican primary voters.You have guaranteed that millions of Republicans will stay at home in November, and have destroyed the party itself.
This gives away the game:The party Oligarchs are using Cruz as a convenient place to park delegates denied to Trump.The Oligarch Plan is to stall Trump below 1,000 delegates, while pumping Cruz up to near parity.Why 1,000?It constitutes one of those “mental barriers” where it’s easier to sell the idea that Trump is “too far away” from the goal line.
We have outright theft, fraud, and deception by the GOP elites.In Virginia, a district that Trump won by 30% has been given delegates for Cruz.A blatant over-ride of the election outcome.With both Trump and Cruz at roughly equal delegates, the Oligarchy will then use that as an excuse to paint a narrative of an “intractable deadlock” that can only be broken by parachuting in someone like Paul Ryan, which has actually been the Oligarch Plan all along.Kasich is being kept around as a fallback position just in case they can’t pull off the parachute scenario.It wasn’t about securing a win for Cruz; he’ll get dumped by the Oligarchs in the second round of nominee voting at the Cleveland convention.
This is an easy forecast to make, because we’ve been here before.In 2012, Mitt Romney and the Oligarchs revised Rule 40(b) from winning the majority of delegates in five states to eight states in order to block Ron Paul’s name being submitted for nomination, and denying him the opportunity to give a speech at the convention.In 2012, the Oligarchs were arrogant enough to think they could win the general election without the support of Ron Paul voters.They were wrong.When Election Day came, a crucial 3 million Republicans stayed home, and it resulted in Romney losing to Obama.
You can’t plausibly argue that the GOP Oligarchs don’t realize that they will hemorrhage even more Trump voters.They’ve gone out of their way to alienate Trump supporters, labelling them as “racists”, “fascists” and worse.This lays the seeds of the GOP’s destruction.
Here is why:Political experts estimate that the GOP cannot afford to lose even 10% of its voter strength and hope to win in the general election.Does anyone in their right mind not believe that parachuting in a “selected” nominee against the will of the voters will result in at least ten percent of the voters staying home on Election Day?It is more likely that 30-50% or more quit the Republican party and refuse to vote for any pre-selected candidates.A full 70% of the Republican voting base has consistently rejected Establishment Candidates that pushed amnesty on immigration.That’s the death of the national party right there.The disaffected will either start a Third Party, or there is going to be bloodshed in the streets.
The Republican elites don’t care.They will happily fold in to the Democrat Party and turn America over to One Party Rule where elections are meaningless.This is what Tyranny looks like.
HERE Is WHAT WILL HAPPEN If The DEEP STATE TAKES DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP & It’s NOT PRETTY … FOR THEM
“The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson
ELDER PATRIOT – Corrupt politicians ignore Jefferson’s directive to their own detriment. It’s no longer political, it’s personal.
Americans have had their eyes opened by the ascension of Donald Trump and no amount of leftwing money can put the Freedom Movement genie back in the bottle.
Conservative Senator Ted Cruz made that observation after reviewing the results of the 2016 elections and the expectations of the voters.
Cruz, who had the most high profile personality clash with Donald Trump during the Republican primary process nevertheless embraced Trump’s America First agenda and said, “If we’re given the White House and both houses of Congress and we don’t deliver, I think there will be pitchforks and torches in the streets. And I think quite rightly.”
Candidate Trump promised many things – border control, lower taxes, fairer trade relations, a balanced budget, healthcare that puts the people first not the government, safer communities, and – to the extent possible – an end to foreign wars. What, among those promises, should any Republican, nay any American, have a problem with?
After four months without a single legislative achievement, Congressional and Senatorial Republicans – notably John McCain, Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham – have joined the Democrats in investigating President Trump absent a single shred of evidence that an underlying crime has been committed.
So, what gives?
Well, there was one additional promise that Trump made on his way to the White House that has some Republicans joining with Democrats and quaking in their boots, Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp.”
As we reported yesterday, “An F.B.I. agent with ‘intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case’ told us that they uncovered evidence of such massive corruption that the agents involved realized that damned near the entire government could be brought down.”
The criminal co-conspirators in both parties realized almost immediately that the new sheriff wasn’t interested in joining them in the swamp so they launched, what can only be characterized as, a coup attempt.
Democrats are well schooled in such things probably because of their close alliance with Marxist regimes that can only gain power by seizing it through bloody civil wars. It should be noted that the Democratic Party has already done this once before.
One Hundred and Fifty-Seven years ago the Democrats waged a war against the First Republican President Abraham Lincoln for giving Blacks their freedom. That war came at a high price, as many as 700,000 Americans died fighting for what they believe in. To put that in perspective, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam.
Today, Americans are still prepared to fight and die to protect their children’s God-given freedoms. Despite what you are reading and hearing in the mainstream media, they aren’t the leftwing-funded rioters, the pussy hat-wearing feminists, or the cuck bois that cant handle a micro aggression. No, the Americans that back Donald Trump are well armed.
Donald Trump’s presidency will move forward politically lest the sixty million patriots who voted for him, that are comprised of the large majority of military voters, police, and NRA members, move it forward by force.
These patriots are armed, trained, prepared, and have proven their discipline. They have grown disgusted by the corruption in Washington and will do whatever is necessary to make sure Trump’s Freedom Agenda moves forward and under the direction of Donald Trump himself.
No amount of fake news based on unsubstantiated charges by unnamed sources is going to change that. The battle lines have been drawn and no amount of finger pointing is going to convince these patriots to let anyone overturn the election results.
So why are establishment politicians courting a bloodbath on the streets of America that will also threaten them personally when they could be part of Making America Great Again? It’s because they have been caught red-handed and up to their eyeballs in a worldwide criminal conspiracy that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with defrauding the American taxpayers.
And, now that they’ve been caught robbing the world’s largest bank – the U.S. treasury – they have chosen to go out in a blaze of glory rather than try to defend the indefensible at trial.
Washington’s criminal elites have chosen to go to war to unseat our duly elected president. It’s time to make our voices heard before this turns very ugly. Buckle your chin strap, America is counting on you.
EDITORS NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CALL TO ARMS BUT RATHER AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE DEEP STATES OVERTURNS A DUELY ELECTED PRESIDENT.
HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP
“Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance.
Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.”
Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump.
Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon.
“Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.”
Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday.
The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.”
But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why?
At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime.
“The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained:
For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code.
However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct.
A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.”
However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him.
. Obama’s Iran nuke deal
Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server
Obama IRS targets conservatives
Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters
Obamacare & Obama’s false promises
Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order
Operation Fast & Furious
5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl
‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session
Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval
Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law
Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act
Illegally conducting war against Libya
NSA: Spying on Americans
Muslim Brotherhood ties
Solyndra and the lost $535 million
Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress
Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers
Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’