Socialist Traitor Caught Red Handed Leaking Top Secret Documents To Sabotage Trump, Incriminates Obama Instead

ELDER PATRIOT – According to an affidavit contained in the criminal complaint handed down in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Bernie Sanders supporter Reality Leigh Winner, a 25-year-old contractor with Pluribus International Corporation, has been charged with leaking a National Security Agency (NSA) report on Russian Election hacking to left-wing news site The Intercept.

The stolen NSA report details the spear-phishing attack that involved infiltrating the systems of local voting officials through emails that mimicked those of the software provider that powered the voting machines and voter registration files they were using. 


Jake Williams is the founder of computer security firm Rendition Infosec and was formerly a member of the NSA’s Tailored Access Operations hacking team.  Williams said if this type of attack were successful, the perpetrator would possess “unlimited” capacity for siphoning away items of interest. “Once the user opens up that email the attacker has all the same capabilities that the user does.”

This is separate from the Wikileaks revelations.  It falls short of suggesting any connection between Russia and the DNC hacking that occurred prior to the election.

There has been no link established, at this time, to Donald Trump or to any member of his campaign.  There has also been no evidence that the hacking resulted in any alteration in voter totals or in any disruptions due to voters having been removed from or added to the voter identification lists in the eight states that the vendor’s software was employed.

Here’s what has been established though.

A senior law enforcement official said, “In August 2016 warnings went out from the FBI and DHS to those agencies. This was not a surprise. This was not hard to defend against. But you needed a commitment of budget and attention.”

Bruce Schneier, a cybersecurity expert at Harvard’s Berkman Center echoed those sentiments; “The problem we have is that voting security doesn’t matter until something happens, and then after something happens, there’s a group of people who don’t want the security, because whatever happened, happened in their favor. That makes it a very hard security problem.”

There’s ample reason to believe that Schneier is 100% correct.  During the third presidential debate in October, Hillary Clinton tried to conflate this evidence into collusion between Trump and Russia but we now know it was a separate, apparently unsuccessful, attempt to penetrate our voting systems that affected nothing. 

The information we currently have cannot confirm that these hackers were official state actors.  If they weren’t that might explain why they penetrated the voting system but did nothing to affect the vote.  Let’s assume that they were official state actors.

This was apparently well known in Democrat circles.  At a December press conference, President Obama admitted that he told Russian President Vladimir Putin as early as September not to hack the U.S. election infrastructure.  That was the extent of his actions.

Why was nothing done to secure these voting systems?  Did the Democrats already sense that Hillary Clinton was going to lose and didn’t want to expose their complicity in working with the Russians to corrupt future voting?

Keep in mind, Fox News reported on a 2010 program headed by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to help Moscow develop a “Russian Silicon Valley” that likely involved some of America’s biggest tech companies into “industrial espionage” – even advancing the country’s military and spying operations.

Also, remember that Hillary was responsible for signing off on the transfer of 20% of the U.S. uranium stockpile to Russian companies while the Clinton Foundation was simultaneously receiving $135 million in donations from entities and individuals with connections to those companies.

There was also this capture on an open mic between President Obama and Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev prior to the 2012 U.S. presidential election:

Then there was Hillary and Obama’s absolutely inexplicable Middle East policy that resulted in the vacuum that has allowed Russia to spread its influence throughout the region.

Why in the world would the Russians want to see Obama and Clinton stripped of their power?

Obama used the hacking incident to order his Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson to suggest nationalizing our voting infrastructure that only would’ve subverted they only thing that protects us from election hackers…and a rogue government like the one that Obama has established.

Think this is an unfair accusation?  According to Schneier “Hacking an election is hard, not because of technology — that’s surprisingly easy — but it’s hard to know what’s going to be effective.” If you look at the last few elections, 2000 was decided in Florida, 2004 in Ohio, the most recent election in a couple counties in Michigan and Pennsylvania, so deciding exactly where to hack is really hard to know.”

In other words, it’s our decentralized voting system, using different technologies, spread among many thousands of voting districts coupled with our Electoral College system that actually protects us from outside interference.

The whole Russian hacking narrative to aid Donald Trump makes no sense but here’s a narrative that does incorporate the facts as we know them to be today:

Obama may have opened a back door for Russian election interference hacking or, at least, ignored the threat when it surfaced.  Why?  For many reasons, beginning with providing Russia with a channel to corrupting future elections to favor future “Progressive” candidates.

There’s also the likelihood that both Obama and Hillary knew she had no chance of winning the election and that Russian hacking would serve as a convenient excuse afterwards. 

How can I say Hillary knew she was going to lose?  Easy, she spent time raising money – that becomes hers – rather than traveling to states where she might’ve been able to influence the outcome of the election.  That makes no sense unless she’d already conceded to herself and was intent – as she’s always been – with lining her pockets.

Regardless, there’s still no evidence to suggest that Russia had anything to do with the Trump campaign.  More importantly there’s nothing to suggest Russia had any preference to see Donald Trump elected president but there’s a ton of evidence suggesting that they would’ve preferred a Clinton presidency.

HERE Is WHAT WILL HAPPEN If The DEEP STATE TAKES DOWN PRESIDENT TRUMP & It’s NOT PRETTY … FOR THEM “The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” – Thomas Jefferson ELDER PATRIOT – Corrupt politicians ignore Jefferson’s directive to their own detriment. It’s no longer political, it’s personal. Americans have had their eyes opened by the ascension of Donald Trump and no amount of leftwing money can put the Freedom Movement genie back in the bottle. Conservative Senator Ted Cruz made that observation after reviewing the results of the 2016 elections and the expectations of the voters. Cruz, who had the most high profile personality clash with Donald Trump during the Republican primary process nevertheless embraced Trump’s America First agenda and said, “If we’re given the White House and both houses of Congress and we don’t deliver, I think there will be pitchforks and torches in the streets. And I think quite rightly.” Candidate Trump promised many things – border control, lower taxes, fairer trade relations, a balanced budget, healthcare that puts the people first not the government, safer communities, and – to the extent possible – an end to foreign wars. What, among those promises, should any Republican, nay any American, have a problem with? After four months without a single legislative achievement, Congressional and Senatorial Republicans – notably John McCain, Paul Ryan and Lindsey Graham – have joined the Democrats in investigating President Trump absent a single shred of evidence that an underlying crime has been committed. So, what gives? Well, there was one additional promise that Trump made on his way to the White House that has some Republicans joining with Democrats and quaking in their boots, Trump’s promise to “Drain the Swamp.” As we reported yesterday, “An F.B.I. agent with ‘intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case’ told us that they uncovered evidence of such massive corruption that the agents involved realized that damned near the entire government could be brought down.” The criminal co-conspirators in both parties realized almost immediately that the new sheriff wasn’t interested in joining them in the swamp so they launched, what can only be characterized as, a coup attempt. Democrats are well schooled in such things probably because of their close alliance with Marxist regimes that can only gain power by seizing it through bloody civil wars. It should be noted that the Democratic Party has already done this once before. One Hundred and Fifty-Seven years ago the Democrats waged a war against the First Republican President Abraham Lincoln for giving Blacks their freedom. That war came at a high price, as many as 700,000 Americans died fighting for what they believe in. To put that in perspective, these casualties exceed the nation’s loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam. Today, Americans are still prepared to fight and die to protect their children’s God-given freedoms. Despite what you are reading and hearing in the mainstream media, they aren’t the leftwing-funded rioters, the pussy hat-wearing feminists, or the cuck bois that cant handle a micro aggression. No, the Americans that back Donald Trump are well armed. Donald Trump’s presidency will move forward politically lest the sixty million patriots who voted for him, that are comprised of the large majority of military voters, police, and NRA members, move it forward by force. These patriots are armed, trained, prepared, and have proven their discipline. They have grown disgusted by the corruption in Washington and will do whatever is necessary to make sure Trump’s Freedom Agenda moves forward and under the direction of Donald Trump himself. No amount of fake news based on unsubstantiated charges by unnamed sources is going to change that. The battle lines have been drawn and no amount of finger pointing is going to convince these patriots to let anyone overturn the election results. So why are establishment politicians courting a bloodbath on the streets of America that will also threaten them personally when they could be part of Making America Great Again? It’s because they have been caught red-handed and up to their eyeballs in a worldwide criminal conspiracy that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with defrauding the American taxpayers. And, now that they’ve been caught robbing the world’s largest bank – the U.S. treasury – they have chosen to go out in a blaze of glory rather than try to defend the indefensible at trial. Washington’s criminal elites have chosen to go to war to unseat our duly elected president. It’s time to make our voices heard before this turns very ugly. Buckle your chin strap, America is counting on you. EDITORS NOTE: THIS IS NOT A CALL TO ARMS BUT RATHER AN ANALYSIS OF WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE DEEP STATES OVERTURNS A DUELY ELECTED PRESIDENT. HERE IS A LIST OF EVERY SINGLE TIME OBAMA COMMITTED AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE THAT DEMS & MEDIA COVERED UP “Impeach!” It’s been more than eight years since Democrats uttered that word – long enough for anyone to wonder if it was still in their vocabulary, considering the deafening silence through the dozens of serious scandals during President Obama’s administration – but now that President Trump is the man in the White House, it’s back with a vengeance. Democrats everywhere are wildly slinging the “I” word, hoping to nail Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors after the New York Times claimed a memo written by former FBI Director James Comey said the president urged him to end the federal investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Some members of Congress are getting in on the action. They include Reps. Maxine Water, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas. Even a Republican, Rep. Justin Amash, claimed Wednesday there are grounds to impeach President Trump. House Oversign Committee Chair Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, asked for the alleged Comey memo and other documents. Chaffetz tweeted that he is prepared to subpoena the information. And Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., invoked “Watergate.” Now the Democratic Party is reportedly poll testing impeachment as a 2018 election issue. More than 1 million people signed a petition calling on Congress to impeach Trump. Wasting no time Wednesday, the mainstream media sprang into action, enthusiastically echoing the left’s impeachment calls. MSNBC launched a Watergate ad implying Trump is America’s new Richard Nixon. “Watergate. We know its name because there were reporters who never stopped asking questions,” says MSNBC host Chris Hayes, who hinted that Trump is next on the impeachment chopping block. “Now, who knows where the questions will take us. But I know this: I’m not going to stop asking them.” Meanwhile, some overzealous members of the left plastered fliers around Washington, D.C., demanding all White House staffers resign Wednesday. The posters read: “If you work for this White House you are complicit in hate-mongering, lies, corrupt taking of Americans’ tax money via self-dealing and emoluments, and quite possibly federal crimes and treason. Also, any wars will be on your soul. … Resign now.” But constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, who voted for President Obama, warned “impeachment” enthusiasts not to get ahead of themselves with President Trump. Why? At this time, there’s no evidence Trump actually committed a crime. “The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo,” Turley wrote in a May 17 opinion piece posted at the Hill. Turley explained: For the first time, the Comey memo pushes the litany of controversies surrounding Trump into the scope of the United States criminal code. However, if this is food for obstruction of justice, it is still an awfully thin soup. Some commentators seem to be alleging criminal conduct in office or calling for impeachment before Trump completed the words of his inaugural oath of office. Not surprising, within minutes of the New York Times report, the response was a chorus of breathless “gotcha” announcements. But this memo is neither the Pentagon Papers nor the Watergate tapes. Indeed, it raises as many questions for Comey as it does Trump in terms of the alleged underlying conduct. A good place to start would be with the federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. 1503. The criminal code demands more than what Comey reportedly describes in his memo. There are dozens of different variations of obstruction charges ranging from threatening witnesses to influencing jurors. None would fit this case. That leaves the omnibus provision on attempts to interfere with the “due administration of justice.” However, that still leaves the need to show that the effort was to influence “corruptly” when Trump could say that he did little but express concern for a longtime associate. The term “corruptly” is actually defined differently under the various obstruction provisions, but it often involves a showing that someone acted “with the intent to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or another.” Encouraging leniency or advocating for an associate is improper but not necessarily seeking an unlawful benefit for him. . Obama’s Iran nuke deal Obama knew about Hillary’s private email server Obama IRS targets conservatives Obama’s DOJ spies on AP reporters Obamacare & Obama’s false promises Illegal-alien amnesty by executive order Benghazi-gate Operation Fast & Furious 5 Taliban leaders for Bergdahl Extortion 17 ‘Recess ‘ appointments – when Senate was in session Appointment of ‘czars’ without Senate approval Suing Arizona for enforcing federal law Refusal to defend Defense of Marriage Act Illegally conducting war against Libya NSA: Spying on Americans Muslim Brotherhood ties Miriam Carey Birth certificate Executive orders Solyndra and the lost $535 million Egypt Cap & Trade: When in doubt, bypass Congress Refusal to prosecute New Black Panthers Obama’s U.S. citizen ‘hit list’